I was trying to explain things to Iain today, being that he's a strict baseball fan. He didn't even know who Mike Vanderjagt is, God bless him (and I almost didn't want to spoil his innocence).
So I explained. "It would be like...if the Sox won three of the last five World Series, and it had all come down to saves by Keith Foulke every time, and then all of a sudden the Red Sox wouldn't pay him and he went to the Yankees.
"And then everyone was talking about who was going to be our closer now, and people were like...well...Kyle Farnsworth is available."
Except even that analogy isn't very apt, since there are some people in the world, anywhere, who actually like Kyle Farnsworth. This cannot be said about Mike Vanderjagt, whose name nonetheless comes up frighteningly often in talk about who will replace Vinatieri. Whenever it does, though I am not religious, I make the sign of the cross.
What a nightmare this is. I mean, it's obvious Belichick knows what he's doing. And it has been pointed out that Vinatieri has slipped a little, that he's had back problems and may be on the downside. Another theory is, yes, Adam's been key for us but maybe we want to redo the team so that it doesn't always come down to a field goal--we get a touchdown instead and never miss him. The bottom line, in the end, is that if there was ever a FO that had the unquestioning faith of its fans, it's the Patriots of this era. And so forth.
So while you'd think I'd been inured to pain by being a Red Sox fan, I find that this is entirely different, trickier territory. At least when something awful happens with the Red Sox, you can have a good whinge--you've earned it. With the Patriots, even if there is reason to caterwaul, it's still looking three of five in the mouth. You're stuck--and so far, the general response from Patriots Nation has been a kind of stifled "Huurk."
After I'd explained it all to him, Iain's response was: "This feels like the valley of the shadow of death - too much all at once.
"I think this is one of the unconscious reasons why I only now follow one sport," he added. "I don't think I could take this kind of grief on several fronts at the same time."
It's not so bad as all that. As I will continue to stress here, Patriots fans have been obscenely lucky so far this decade. In all, what I really find most unsettling is that, for so long, us dual sporters have been relying on the Patriots for consistency, as a balm for pain from the Sox. You could always kind of take them for granted. Not so much now--and with a lot of things still up in the air in Sox Nation, it's not hard to imagine being in a sports-fan lake of fire by this summer, with noplace to turn.
"Maybe the Sox will now be a balm to Patriots pain," Iain pointed out hopefully.
But that's just...that would be like I'd have to get used to the idea that up was down and black was white.
And if this douchebag shows up in a Patriots uniform next season...well...then it might be time to deploy the emergency cyanide capsule.
Wow. I feel the same way as Iain about only following one sport. I've not been a follower, although I would say a fan, of the Patriots for about 4 years now. I think my biggest reason was that it just became too much work to follow both. I think I actually was using the Pats as a balm all thru the 90's! No need for that since 2002!
As far as the whole who's a balm for who, I'm, gonna take this angle. Be glad that you live in a market where both the baseball team AND the football teams at least COMPETE each year! Rather live in Detroit?
Posted by: David Welch | March 22, 2006 at 13:09
inured...whinge...caterwaul
Please! I am but a simple caveman Pats fan. Your big words frighten and confuse me. I do not understand why men play with strange-shaped ball to get things called TDs and FGs. But what I do know is that when man with V name kicks ball, ball goes between two big yellow posts. And I get scared thinking about V man kicking with blue shirt on and hoof print on side of head.
Also, caveman Pats fans do not go "Huurk". We just say "Ugghh" when number 12 man throws ball to other team, or "Oooof" when hitting each other on head with clubs afterward.
Posted by: BosoxBob | March 22, 2006 at 15:18
bob, if that's what you really think of football fans, i don't know what to tell you.
Posted by: beth | March 22, 2006 at 15:25
He didn't even know who Mike Vanderjagt is
Oh great - news of my ignorance spreads like wildfire across the interweb... ;-)
Posted by: Iain | March 22, 2006 at 15:53
stop it. i ENVIED you that.
Posted by: beth | March 22, 2006 at 15:56
Seriously, Iain, listen to the women. It is not a pleasant thing to know of Mike Vanderjagt, and to imagine him.....I can't even say it.
It's like the knowledge of good and evil, once you do, it is burned on your brain forever. And, ew.
Ignorance of Mike Vanderjagt is bliss, Iain.
Posted by: Emma | March 22, 2006 at 16:01
I think I would actually throw up if I read that the Pats went out and signed Vander-jackass, the most anti-clutch kicker ever.
I think you are right though that the Pats are looking to get younger, (they need to do this in several areas). Hopefully they sign Edinger. At age 28 maybe he is just one peice of that puzzle.
In the end I think come July the Pats will be ok, but Adam was one of the few players that I allowed myself to be 'attached' to, so to speak, so seeing him go hurts, seeing him going to a team like the Colts hurts even more. [gnashes teeth]
Posted by: mrbandw | March 22, 2006 at 16:15
yes, i think that, should that dark day ever come, we'd have to call an emergency support group meeting on Boston Common. perhaps a candlelight vigil as well.
Posted by: beth | March 22, 2006 at 16:17
bob, if that's what you really think of football fans, i don't know what to tell you.
Beth - it was meant as a joke. Perhaps you are not familiar with the Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer sketches that Phil Hartman used to do on Saturday Night Live...
Posted by: BosoxBob | March 22, 2006 at 17:58
Now try being a Lions fan on top of that and learning that Joey Harrington is saying "I hate everyone on this team, and everyone hates me."
Actually, no, I take it all back. It would've been much, much, MUCH worse to be a seriously dedicated Marlins fan this offseason. That would've been worse than anything.
And quiet, you. I know he went to the Yankees, but it's awfully hard for me to not love someone who physically destroyed a Kansas City Royal while in a Tigers uni.
Posted by: Boston Fan in Michigan | March 22, 2006 at 18:44
i think i tried to keep things impartial re farnsworth. but i figured you'd jump on me anyway. :-)
anywho, i think we've had this convo before, sam, but the fact that it sucks to be a lions fan doesn't really make me feel any better about adam vinatieri going to the Dark Side.
Posted by: beth | March 22, 2006 at 19:24
Wow, I'm totally out of the loop on this one. I like Vinatieri but fercrissakes he's the kicker.
You want to pay 3mil for a kicker?
Despite the fact that big V delivered the go ahead points in two of the SB's and was so crucial in the snow game with Oak, I'm still of the mind that if you have to rely on your kicker that much, there's other issues that need addressing first.
Think "Moneyball" here. A player can reach a point where they are no longer cost effective and you can find somebody almost as good at a much better value (see Coco Crisp v Johnny Damon).
Trust in Belichick. Trust in Theo.
My two cents...
Posted by: Edw. | March 23, 2006 at 13:26
Well said Ed
See, Beth. I CAN write poetry . . .
Posted by: David Welch | March 23, 2006 at 13:31
//Despite the fact that big V delivered the go ahead points in two of the SB's and was so crucial in the snow game with Oak, I'm still of the mind that if you have to rely on your kicker that much, there's other issues that need addressing first. //
i believe this was addressed in my post. i understand the logic of all that. but it's still difficult to see a beloved player go to a hated team. i am maintaining my faith in belichick but it is difficult sometimes when you have an emotional attachment to a player.
and no matter what the rationale for vinatieri leaving, having to deal with mike vanderjagt in a pats uniform would be unequivocally awful.
Posted by: beth | March 23, 2006 at 13:52
OK I see your point, however I have to agree with Ed W. Additionally I think any emotional attachment would be better directed toward a certain #12. After all wouldn't mourning the loss of a kicker kind of be like getting upset about the batboy leaving the sox? There are reputable sports personalities who maintain that kickers should be eliminated, they mean that little. I wouldn't go that far but I'm almost there every time I see a kicker get hurt trying to tackle a returner, or worse yet get hurt while celebrating. That being said V. was a class act, the bang for the buck just isn't there.
By the way at least the "douchebag" is out of the running.
Posted by: Jay | March 23, 2006 at 16:20
i think i'm just in a bad mood today, but why are we arguing about whether or not i'm sad to see adam go? and worried about the state of the patriots in general, especially given the number of players who have left? i have NEVER said i think the patriots are going down the crapper--i HAVE said i have faith that belichick and pioli know what they're doing. but i feel anxious, because i care about the team. is this not understandable at all?
why is it not permissible to be sad to see a player as important as adam vinatieri was to the super bowl teams (kicker = bat boy? i couldn't disagree more), go to a team you hate? the fact that this could work out for the best doesn't mean i'm not going to miss adam personally, doesn't mean i want to see him go to a team i consider the dark side. i mean, what's there to argue with about that? i feel how i feel. acting like i'm ridiculous doesn't change that.
and finally, the fact that i have emotional attachment to adam doesn't mean i have none directed at #12--anyone who knows me or has read more than one post on this blog knows that for sure. and even if i didn't, you can't just decide, "oh, i think i'll just be attached to this other player instead now." emotions don't, um, work like that.
and what happens when / if *HE* leaves the team? if i write a post being sad about that, will you come back and tell me i'm wrong because sports is a business, and i should never have gotten attached in the first place?
it is what it is. i guess i didn't get what i was trying to say across in this post at all.
Posted by: beth | March 23, 2006 at 16:33
Don't know if these will make you feel better or not, but they helped me a bit:
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2006/03/09/ramblings/four-downs/3727/
http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Article.php?Page=747&Category=1
Posted by: Dominic | March 23, 2006 at 19:22